Introduction
Effective communication and marketing require an understanding of how to create and maintain a positive image of a brand or organization. The Vision Culture Image (VCI) Model is a framework that provides guidance on how to achieve this by aligning the vision, culture, and image of an organization. This article will provide an overview of the VCI Model, its components, and its importance in communication and marketing. Additionally, it will explore criticisms of the model, including examples of misuse, limitations, and a big flaw compared to similar models and theories.
Overview of the VCI Model
The VCI Model was first introduced by M. Joseph Hatch and Mark Schultz in their 2001 book “The Dynamics of Corporate Branding.” The model proposes that an organization’s vision, culture, and image should be aligned to create a cohesive and positive brand identity. The model has three main components: vision, culture, and image.
Vision refers to an organization’s long-term goals and aspirations. It includes the mission, values, and purpose of the organization. Culture refers to the shared values, beliefs, and attitudes of an organization’s members. It includes the norms, traditions, and rituals that shape the behavior of employees. Finally, image refers to the external perception of the organization by its stakeholders, including customers, investors, and the public.
The VCI Model proposes that by aligning these three components, an organization can create a strong brand identity that enhances its reputation and image. The model emphasizes that all three components are interdependent and must be aligned to achieve success. A positive image is the result of a strong culture and a clear vision, and a strong culture is a result of a clear vision and positive image.
Importance of the VCI Model in Communication and Marketing
The VCI Model is an essential tool for communication and marketing professionals. It helps them to create a cohesive and consistent brand identity that resonates with their target audience. By aligning an organization’s vision, culture, and image, communication and marketing professionals can communicate a clear and compelling message that reinforces the brand’s identity.
For example, the VCI Model was used by the LEGO Company to revitalize its brand in the early 2000s. The company faced declining sales and a lack of direction in the late 1990s, and it needed to reposition itself to remain competitive. Using the VCI Model, the company developed a clear vision of “inspiring and developing the builders of tomorrow,” which aligned with its values of creativity, imagination, and learning. This vision was communicated through a strong company culture that encouraged innovation and collaboration, and a positive image that highlighted the company’s commitment to quality and creativity. As a result, LEGO was able to turn around its business and become a leader in the toy industry.
Criticism of the VCI Model
While the VCI Model is a useful framework for communication and marketing, it has faced criticism for its limitations and potential for misuse. One criticism of the model is that it does not account for external factors that can impact an organization’s image, such as economic conditions, market competition, political climate, technological advancements or regulatory changes. In other words, the VCI Model assumes that an organization’s image is entirely within its control, which is not always the case.
Another limitation of the VCI Model is that it does not consider the role of stakeholders in shaping an organization’s image. While the model proposes that an organization’s image is the result of its culture and vision, it does not account for the influence of stakeholders such as customers, employees, or the media. These groups can shape an organization’s image by sharing their experiences and opinions, which may not always align with the organization’s intended image.
As such, the model’s narrow focus on internal factors limits its ability to fully capture the complexity of the dynamic and constantly changing business environment.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the Vision Culture Image (VCI) Model is a useful tool for understanding how organizations manage their image and communicate with their stakeholders. The model’s three components (vision, culture, and image) are interconnected and must be aligned for effective communication to occur. While the VCI Model has its strengths, such as its focus on the importance of organizational culture and its ability to help organizations create a strong, unified image, it also has its limitations and potential for misuse. It is important to recognize these limitations and to use the model appropriately to achieve the desired outcomes. Additionally, the VCI Model is not the only model or theory of communication and organizational culture available. Therefore, it is essential to evaluate the VCI Model in comparison to other models and theories to determine its usefulness in specific contexts. Overall, the VCI Model provides a valuable framework for understanding how organizations communicate and create their image, but it is just one of many tools that can be used to achieve effective communication and management of organizational culture and identity.
References
Becker, K. (2004). Where is visual culture in contemporary theories of media and communication?. Nordicom Review, 25(1-2), 149-157. https://scholar.googleusercontent.com/scholar?q=cache:SNDN_60vbVAJ:scholar.google.com/+vision+culture+image+model+communication&hl=nl&as_sdt=0,5
Dowling, G. R. (1993). Developing your company image into a corporate asset. Long Range Planning, 26(2), 101–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(93)90141-2
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (1997). Relations between organizational culture, identity and image. European Journal of Marketing, 31(5/6), 356–365. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb060636
Hatch, M. J., & Schultz, M. (2003). Bringing the corporation into corporate branding. European Journal of Marketing, 37(7/8), 1041–1064. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560310477654
Schultz, M., & Hatch, M. J. (2003). The Cycles of Corporate Branding: The Case of the LEGO Company. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41166229