Introduction
Attitudes are an essential aspect of human behavior and play a critical role in shaping how we interact with the world around us. Explicit and implicit attitudes are two fundamental types of attitudes that have been studied extensively in social psychology. While explicit attitudes are conscious and deliberate, implicit attitudes are unconscious and automatic. This article aims to provide a comprehensive overview of explicit and implicit attitudes, including their definitions, differences, and criticisms.
Definitions of Explicit and Implicit Attitudes
Explicit attitudes are conscious beliefs and evaluations that individuals can self-report. These attitudes are typically measured through self-report questionnaires, interviews, or other explicit measures that require participants to reflect on their attitudes and report them to the researcher. For example, if someone is asked, “What is your attitude toward climate change?”, and they answer, “I believe it is a serious problem that needs to be addressed,” they are expressing an explicit attitude.
In contrast, implicit attitudes are unconscious beliefs and evaluations that individuals may not be aware of or able to self-report. These attitudes are typically measured through implicit measures that assess the speed and accuracy of responses to stimuli that are associated with a particular attitude. For example, the Implicit Association Test (IAT) measures the strength of associations between different concepts (e.g., “black” and “good,” “white” and “bad”) to infer implicit attitudes. The basic idea is that if someone is quicker to associate “good” words with “white” faces and “bad” words with “black” faces, they may have an implicit bias against black people, even if they explicitly claim not to hold such a bias.
Differences Between Explicit and Implicit Attitudes
Explicit and implicit attitudes differ in several ways. First, explicit attitudes are conscious and deliberate, while implicit attitudes are automatic and unconscious. Second, explicit attitudes are typically stable and resistant to change, while implicit attitudes are more malleable and subject to change based on experience and feedback. Third, explicit attitudes are better predictors of deliberate, controlled behaviors, while implicit attitudes are better predictors of automatic, spontaneous behaviors.
For example, suppose someone explicitly expresses positive attitudes towards people from a particular ethnic group. In that case, they are more likely to engage in deliberate, controlled behaviors that are consistent with these attitudes, such as seeking out interactions with members of that group. However, if their implicit attitudes are negative, they may unconsciously engage in automatic, spontaneous behaviors that are inconsistent with their explicit attitudes, such as avoiding eye contact or showing signs of discomfort when interacting with members of that group.
Criticism
One criticism is that implicit attitudes may not be as reliable or valid as explicit attitudes. Because implicit attitudes are inferred based on reaction time and accuracy, they may be subject to measurement error and contextual factors that could influence the test results.
Another criticism is that implicit attitudes may not always predict behavior accurately. While implicit attitudes may influence spontaneous or automatic behaviors, they may not be as relevant to more deliberative and controlled behaviors that require conscious decision-making. For example, someone may have an implicit bias against people from a particular ethnic group, but if they are consciously aware of this bias, they may be able to control their behavior and interact with members of that group without showing any signs of bias.
Furthermore, some researchers argue that explicit and implicit attitudes may not always be distinct constructs. Instead, they may be interdependent and interact with each other in complex ways. For example, explicit attitudes may influence implicit attitudes, and vice versa, depending on the context and the individual’s experiences.
Conclusion
Explicit and implicit attitudes are two essential constructs in social psychology that have been studied extensively over the years. While explicit attitudes are conscious and
intentional evaluations that people make about a particular object or person, implicit attitudes are automatic, unconscious evaluations that are often influenced by implicit biases. Research has shown that both explicit and implicit attitudes can influence behavior and decision-making, but they operate in different ways.
The study of explicit and implicit attitudes has many practical implications in fields such as marketing, education, and politics. By understanding the differences between explicit and implicit attitudes, it may be possible to develop more effective strategies to change people’s attitudes and behavior.
However, it is important to acknowledge the limitations and potential for misuse of these concepts. Some studies have suggested that implicit measures may not always accurately reflect implicit biases or predict behavior. In addition, there is a risk that explicit and implicit attitudes could be used to justify discriminatory behavior or policies. Therefore, it is important to approach the study of attitudes with caution and be aware of potential biases.
In conclusion, explicit and implicit attitudes are important constructs that have significant implications for social psychology and many practical applications in various fields. Understanding the strengths and limitations of these concepts is essential for developing effective interventions and policies to address issues related to attitudes and behavior.
References
Hahn, A., Judd, C. M., Hirsh, H. K., & Blair, I. V. (2014). Awareness of implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(3), 1369–1392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035028
Hasa, B. (2021, May 6). What is the Difference Between Explicit and Implicit Attitudes – Pediaa.Com. Pediaa.Com. https://pediaa.com/what-is-the-difference-between-explicit-and-implicit-attitudes/
Hing, L. S. S., Chung-Yan, G. A., Hamilton, L., & Zanna, M. P. (2008). A two-dimensional model that employs explicit and implicit attitudes to characterize prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 971–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.971
Hong, J., Hong, A. J., & Kim, S. H. (2021). Exploring Implicit and Explicit Attitudes of Employees’ Authentic Organizational Loyalty. Frontiers in Psychology, 12. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666869
Martinussen, L. M., Petranca, L., & Sømhovd, M. J. (2018). The relationship between explicit and implicit attitudes towards drunk driving. PLOS ONE, 13(10), e0206124. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206124